![]() But she argued that allowing the house to be demolished based on these grounds does nothing to help people of color who have been harmed by racism and segregation. “We’re talking about white male property owners in the 1950s, in Austin, on the west side – and of course they were racist,” she said. This is an important assertion for us to consider as Planning commissioners,” Azhar said.Ĭommissioner Carmen Llanes Pulido said that allegations of racism should come as no surprise. “Focusing on that factor is not here to disparage an individual or family. “We would never landmark a property where a segregationist lived, or there was a racist person,” Kimberly Collins with the Historic Preservation Office said.Ĭommissioner Awais Azhar couldn’t support historic zoning in part due to lingering uncertainty about Slator. What’s more, according to Whellan, Slator likely participated in segregation as the owner of the Tavern on North Lamar Boulevard between 19.Ī city staffer, however, said she found no evidence to support the claim. “These men are not noted for any civic, philanthropic or historic impact,” he said. Whellan also argued that any historical significance derived from the property’s association with Delisle and longtime owner C.H. A structural engineer hired by the owner said any attempt at preservation would involve tearing down and rebuilding – an undertaking Whellan said would likely cost millions. The buildings are run down, he said, and have had substantial renovations. Michael Whellan, an attorney representing the property owner, said that the claims made by preservationists are shaky. “I think it’s an architectural treasure.” “How could anyone buy this property with the intent of destroying it?” Ila Falvey said. ![]() Many have written letters, and a few spoke at the meeting. Tarrytown neighbors have also banded together to stop the demolition. City staffers recommend historic zoning, calling both structures one-of-a-kind examples of vernacular architecture. The Historic Landmark Commission unanimously voted to initiate historic zoning in July, citing architectural significance, landscape features and association to historic figures. Historic preservationists, for their part, overwhelmingly support historic zoning, which would preserve the buildings in perpetuity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |